Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Megan Thee Stallion: Expensive Gifts Don’t Equal Love

Celebrity couples flexing expensive gifts isn't relationship goals—it's BS teaching women love equals dollar signs, not genuine partnership.

Share your love

Another day, another celebrity couple confusing net worth with self-worth by broadcasting their financial flexing as relationship goals. This performative gift-giving culture is teaching women that love is measured in dollar signs, not emotional intelligence or genuine partnership. It’s BS, frankly. Listen up Megan Thee Stallion.

So, Klay Thompson just dropped around two hundred seventy-five grand on a Bentley for Megan Thee Stallion’s birthday. Baby blue, apparently. Cause that’s what every woman needs, right? Another car. Specifically, a very expensive one. And it’s everywhere. All over DailyNewsEdit, Page Six, you name it. Everyone’s talking about it.

Bentley for Megan Thee Stallion’s birthday

And I’m just sitting here, looking at this whole thing, thinking — are we *still* doing this? Still pretending that dropping a small fortune on a gift equates to actual, you know, love? Like, for real? We haven’t moved past this? It’s bonkers.

Here’s the thing. I’ve been around. Seen a lot of things. Lived in places where money was no object for people. Monaco, LA, New York. And I’ve seen more relationships crash and burn than I can count, despite all the Bentleys and the diamonds and the private jets. Because guess what? Material things? They don’t fill the void. They don’t make you feel seen. They don’t make you feel heard. They sure as hell don’t make someone a good partner.

Megan Thee Stallion
Megan Thee Stallion på Kadetten 2022” by NRK P3 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

This whole celebrity gift-giving spectacle, it’s exhausting. It really is. It sets such a messed-up expectation for everyone else. Especially for young women. They see this stuff plastered all over their feeds, “Relationship Goals” they call it. And they start to think that if their boyfriend isn’t buying them a car, or a Birkin bag, or some ridiculous piece of jewelry, then he doesn’t love them as much.

That’s garbage. Absolute garbage. Love isn’t a transaction. It’s not about how much someone *spends* on you. It’s about how they *treat* you. How they support you when things get rough. Are they there when you’re sick? Do they listen to you, really listen, when you’re having a bad day? Do they make you laugh? Do they pick up the kids when you’re swamped? That’s love, people. Not a car that depreciates the moment you drive it off the lot.

I remember this one guy, back in the day, he was loaded. Absolutely filthy rich. And he tried to impress me with all these fancy dinners, designer gifts. Didn’t listen to a word I said. Didn’t care about my work. Just wanted to show off. And you know what? It was a turn-off. Huge turn-off. I can buy my own damn gifts. I can pay for my own dinner. What I couldn’t buy, what I wanted, was genuine connection. And he had none of it. Not an ounce.

And that’s the core of it, isn’t it? These public displays of extravagance. They’re not for the person receiving the gift, not really. They’re for the audience. They’re for the headlines. It’s about proving something to the world, not about nurturing a deep, meaningful connection with your partner. It’s a performance. And it’s a pretty boring one, honestly.

Think about it. These people, they’ve incredible wealth. Two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars? For Klay Thompson, that’s like you or me buying a nice dinner. Maybe a new pair of shoes. It’s not a sacrifice. It’s not something he had to save for, or work extra shifts for. It’s just… a Tuesday. So what does it actually *mean*? Beyond “I have a lot of money and I can spend it on shiny things”? Not much.

Real talk: i’ve worked with some of the biggest names in Hollywood. Christopher Nolan, Hugh Jackman, Scarlett Johansson. And what I learned is that the most successful, grounded people? They’re often the ones who value authenticity. They value realness. Not the show. They certainly don’t confuse a huge price tag with genuine affection.

I mean, if you’re gonna spend that kind of money, how about you invest it in something lasting? Something that actually benefits your partner’s future? Or, hell, something that benefits someone else’s future? There are so many problems in the world, so many people who could use that kind of money for education, for housing, for medical care. But no. Baby blue Bentley. Cause that’s way more Instagrammable, I guess.

It’s not just about the money either. It’s about the message. The message that a woman’s value, or a relationship’s strength, can be quantified by material possessions. It’s so reductive. So utterly devoid of any real depth. We should be teaching young women that they deserve respect. That they deserve kindness. That they deserve someone who will stand by them, through thick and thin, not just someone who can buy them a new set of wheels.

And then there’s the whole “almost a year” thing. That’s what the article said, right? A year. And already this level of extravagant public gift-giving. What happens in five years? Ten? Do the gifts need to get bigger and bigger to prove the love is still there? It’s an unsustainable model. It really is. It creates a weird kind of pressure. For both sides.

For the guy, he’s gotta keep topping himself. For the woman, she’s gotta pretend like this is the ultimate expression of love, even if what she really wants is just a quiet night in and someone who actually listens to her. I’ve seen women get trapped in these gilded cages. All the material things, but completely alone emotionally. It’s a sad, sad situation.

My kids. They don’t care about how much money I spend on them. They care that I’m there. That I play with them. That I read them stories. That I hug them. That’s what matters. That’s what builds a foundation. The same goes for any relationship, for any partnership. It’s the small, consistent acts of love and care that truly count. Not the splashy, expensive gestures.

This whole thing just reminds me of all the superficiality I’ve seen in the entertainment world, in the fashion world. Everyone trying to outdo each other, prove they’re the biggest, the best, the richest. But underneath it all, sometimes there’s just… not much. Just a whole lot of emptiness. And a fancy car. Check out TheManEdit, they’ve been talking about how this kind of pressure affects men too. It’s not just women.

I mean, good for them if they’re happy, truly. I hope they’re. But let’s not confuse a very expensive car with a healthy, loving relationship. We know better than that, or at least we should by now. Let’s start promoting real values, real connection. Let’s stop falling for the BS that money buys happiness or, even worse, love. Because it just doesn’t. It really doesn’t. And anyone who tells you otherwise is probably selling something. Maybe a baby blue Bentley.

I mean, honestly. Get real, people. And for more real talk, check out USLive, they’re not afraid to call out the BS either.

Share your love
Avatar photo

Tamara Fellner

"The game is rigged; I’m just the one circling the wires.” - The General - The woman who stopped playing nice. Tamara spent years in the high-stakes worlds of fashion and tech, seeing the gears of the "Influence Machine" from the inside. Now, she’s the one holding the Red Marker. She doesn't want your likes; she wants you to wake up. -

Tamara Fellner is the CEO of WomanEdit.com, DailyNewsEdit.com, USLive.com, all by Real SuperWoman LLC. And Founder of VelvetHeart.org, a charity devoted to women and children who leave abusive homes and rebuild from zero.

Stay informed and not overwhelmed, subscribe now!